Remember that Sultan Knish Piece…

The Closing of the Liberal Mind that I took a QotD from on Tuesday? Here’s another:

As a scientist, you formulate a conclusion that will lead to a healthier society, and then you build a hypothesis around it, and then you declare it to be science. Your science, like your journalism, consists of the progressive narrative that proves whatever you want it to prove, whether it’s that capitalism will melt the icebergs, homosexuality is genetically fixed or oil is about to run out. Scientific objectivity has no more meaning to you than it did to the Caliph who torched the Library of Alexandria. If science is worth anything, then it’s progressive. And if it doesn’t, then it’s worthless.

And PowerLine has a recent example of exactly that.

Of course, the whole history of gun control is an example of exactly that, but….

Quote of the Day – Registration Edition

Via Oleg Volk:

From Boris Karpa, a man who was an American born elsewhere by accident: “Let me be clear about this: background checks for private transfers is gun registration.

“Not ‘could lead to gun registration’, it literally IS gun registration.

“It does not matter if they put in a little sentence that says ‘the government is not allowed to keep records’ – that sentence will go away at the next mass-shooting – and then the government will simply start hitting the SAVE button after it processes your next gun purchase. We’re in the world of computers now. Keeping terabytes of data only costs a few dollars.

“If Tom Coburn argues that putting a little proviso in there to say ‘you are not allowed to keep records’ makes it anything other but gun registration, that only helps us know who Tom Coburn is.

“What this will decide is nothing less but the answer to the question – is America a unique nation, that trusts its citizens to own weapons – not ‘hunting implements’, not ‘sporting firearms’, but weapons – or it is just another country, and jut like everywhere else, the gun control movement wins battle after battle, and the gun rights organizations are only fighting a delaying action.

“Because if this passes, it will never be repealed. The NRA is not capable of, and does not have the stomach for – attacking existing Federal gun laws. They will promise to work to repeal it. They will lie, just like they lied about the Hughes amendment, where they made some symbolic move to try and strike it down and then surrendered too. But they will not repeal it if it passes.

“If they win this fight, then the gun rights movement in America is over, and everything else is a long delaying action.”

I do not disagree with a single word there.

Quote of the Day – Culture War Edition

Publicola has written an excellent piece, Resolve, that I strongly recommend you read.  Today’s QotD comes from it:

We have to be more determined than our enemies, but our focus does not have to be on them exclusively, or rather not on who we think our enemies are. Bluntly, our enemy isn’t flesh and blood – that’s just a manifestation. Our enemy is the idea that our culture is not worth saving. Our enemy is the notion that our culture can compromise on its values. Our enemy is the practice of appeasement.

I Have an Idea, Joe

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIuk3G9Xixc?rel=0]

Let’s replace all of your security team’s submachineguns and semi-automatic pistols with double-barreled 12 gauge shotguns.  They don’t need thirty rounds (or eighteen) to protect you, right?

In fact, I think all Secret Service protective detail agents should be equipped with Ruger Red Label shotguns and two shells apiece!  If it’s good enough for us, it ought to be good enough for our employees!

Oh, hell, let’s let ’em have Stoeger Tactical Coach Guns so they can hang flashlights, lasers and optics off the rails.

Seriously?

“Designed to prepare officers for the worst possible situation.”

Reader David Turner sent me a link to these Law Enforcement “No More Hesitation” training targets to ask me what I thought of them. Here are four of the seven:

 photo LET-1.jpg  photo LET-5.jpg

 photo LET-6.jpg  photo LET-7.jpg
The sales spiel goes:

No More Hesitation Targets were designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training.  No More Hesitation faded background enhances the isolation and is meant to help the transition for officers who are faced with these highly unusal targets for the first time.

I’m sure these targets are Bob Owens-approved. I wonder when they’re going to start producing “No Hesitation” targets like this:

 photo Tacoma.jpg
Oh, wait! No need!

 photo copshotnewspaperdelivery.jpg
EDITED TO ADD:

Sometimes hesitation is called for:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZTkflzRJ_0?rel=0]
UPDATE II:

What, they don’t carry a “Household Pets” target set?

UPDATE III:

No, this is not satire.  At least the targets themselves aren’t.