The first one, from the film Secondhand Lions:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXn5-r8mj-s?rel=0&showinfo=0]
The second, from Terry Pratchett’s Hogfather:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4oxrTSRkC0?rel=0&showinfo=0]
The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. – Ayn Rand
The first one, from the film Secondhand Lions:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXn5-r8mj-s?rel=0&showinfo=0]
The second, from Terry Pratchett’s Hogfather:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4oxrTSRkC0?rel=0&showinfo=0]
His latest Uncommon Knowledge interview. Worth your 45 minutes.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGYl17DiEwo?rel=0&showinfo=0]
My favorite living economist and philosopher. Still looking good and thinking brilliantly at 85.
Unless you’ve been living under a stump, you’re most likely aware that Clarkson, May and Hammond will be returning to the small screen via Amazon Video next year. (And there was much rejoicing! Yeaaaa!)
I stumbled across this QotD over at Quora.com under the question “What is so special about Top Gear that it has 385 million viewers worldwide?”
The secret is that Top Gear is not about cars. It’s about joy. About unabashedly, unashamedly enjoying life.
It also presents a positive image of masculinity, which is something that is entirely missing from everything else on television.– Rúnar Óli Bjarnason
Abso-fricken-lutely.
I’ve missed the previous 29 Gun Rights Policy Conferences because A) I didn’t know about it, or B) they’ve been too far away or C) too close to the Gun Blogger Rendezvous, but this one is just up the road in Phoenix, and I’m going to have a vacation day to burn, so I’m going this year.
Hope to see you there!
I caught the movie Tomorrowland at a matinee on Saturday. If you haven’t seen it yet, or if you don’t want spoilers, then don’t go below the break, but let me say that it was not the film I was expecting.
Nor was it the Politically Correct Social Justice Warrior Global Warming propaganda piece some are claiming.
Again, here be spoilers. You have been warned.
You’ve probably seen the trailers. Young girl touches medallion, gets transported (in spirit if not in body) to Tomorrowland where everything is clean, beautiful, high-tech, awesome. She meets a curmudgeon who can somehow get her there, but they’re being pursued by Evil Forces.
All that’s there.
What I didn’t expect, however, was the morality tale it DID contain.
Now, perhaps I don’t read the right kind of science fiction, but one thing the movie asks that I haven’t seen asked before is “Where’s the hope?”
(SPOILER!) George Clooney’s character asks the question, “What would you do if I could tell you exactly the date and time you were going to die?” (Paraphrased from memory, but that is the gist of the question.) Seems he’s invented a machine that allows him to see into the future – and the future is grim. Grim with a probability of 100.00 percent. Past this date there be dragons. (Figuratively, not literally.)
But when the young girl responds, “How could you know? What about free will?” the probability indicator drops to 99.94%.
I was reminded of this scene from 2011’s The Adjustment Bureau:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKhvl2MjO9E?rel=0&controls=0]
In this film the equivalent role of “Thompson” is played by Hugh Laurie as “Governor Dix.”
I was also reminded of last year’s “The Giver.” Here’s the key scene from that film:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEDu9jVpUjI?rel=0&controls=0]
It seems over in Tomorrowland they built a machine to broadcast subconscious warnings to us here on Earth of the coming apocalypse.
Humanity’s response?
We internalized the message. We embraced it. Hell, we commercialized it. Disaster movies, zombies movies and TV shows, post-apocalyptic fiction. (Have you ever read Cormac McCarthy’s The Road?) Terrorism and jihad. War and famine. On and on.
Earlier in the film the protagonist is shown in her various high school classes being lectured on: Global Warming, the population bomb, Mutual Assured Destruction and the new threat of nuclear terrorism, etc. Throughout it all, she has her hand up, but is only called on in the last scene. “Who’s trying to fix it?” she asks.
There is no answer.
For at least the first 150 years of this nation (1860-65 notwithstanding) the overwhelming national outlook was optimistic. We could go anywhere, do anything. Hell, in 1962 John F. Kennedy challenged us to send a man to the Moon and return him safely to the earth before 1970 – and we did. We went from a colonial backwater to the most powerful nation on Earth in the relative blink of an eye because, I believe, of one idea: “the pursuit of happiness.”
And in the meantime those who believe “we choose wrong – always” have done everything in their power to choose for us, to remove our ability to choose for ourselves. The message of “The Adjustment Bureau” was that if not for “The Chairman” and the Bureau, humanity would have destroyed the Earth. We needed to be brought along into adulthood by some Higher Power. The idea behind “The Giver” was that we had pretty much destroyed ourselves, and only through the administration of The Elders had this small enclave of civilization survived by essentially removing emotion, choice, hell even thought.
Tomorrowland asks, I think, “When did we stop hoping?“ And why don’t we do something about that?
It’s a good question, and it shouldn’t get lost in hysterics over political correctness.
UPDATE: Bill Whittle, however, makes some good points.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmxeoh69G4o?rel=0&controls=0]
From an answer over at Quora.com to the question: “What do normal Americans think about ‘Draw Prophet Muhammed Cartoon Contest’ organized in Garland, Texas? Was the event about freedom of speech or did it focus on developing anti-Islam sentiments?”
The whole answer is excellent, but I wanted to archive this portion:
We are as viciously, passionately, ready-to-wage-warringly, married to our freedoms as Muslims are to their prophet Muhammad. Never presume that your beliefs are somehow magically more super-duper special than ours just because they are attached to a religious idea. Never fool yourself into believing that others aren’t as dedicated to their philosophical perspective just because you think that your belief is right and theirs is wrong.
From a comment to yesterday’s post:
One of my old friends, a scholar of Talmud and Kaballah, once opined that there was a really important reason $DEITY led Moses and the Israelites around the desert for 40 years between their deliverance from slavery and arrival at the promised land, and it had little to do with petty Divine annoyance on the subject of golden calfs. It was, he explained, to give that society time to let the slave generation die off and train the new generation to conditions of self reliance, to become people fit to determine their own fate. I think there’s a lot to that. Slave instincts of servility are pernicious, and difficult for even the hardiest to shake off.
The Geek’s comment produced this, from reader Magus (edited for clarity):
That one concept has set off a chain of thought within me that makes me weep for the future.
The American Revolution will probably be unique in the rest of human history. There are no more frontiers. There are no more areas where people can learn that they are or can become competent in managing their own life. Now there’s always an “agency” to take your problem to. And if you don’t take your issue to the appropriate “agency” you are punished.
We are among the last generations that will know anything like freedom or liberty. Privacy, for the most part, has already been destroyed. If you say anything like that to the majority of people now they’ll tell you that “you’re batshit crazy”.
Freedom is not comfortable or stable, and people want comfort and stability.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn once said:
In a state of psychological weakness, weapons become a burden for the capitulating side. To defend oneself, one must also be ready to die; there is little such readiness in a society raised in the cult of material well-being. Nothing is left, then, but concessions, attempts to gain time and betrayal.
I believe they’re both describing the same condition.
And I am reminded once more of the words of the Rev. Donald Sensing from 2003:
I predict that the Bush administration will be seen by freedom-wishing Americans a generation or two hence as the hinge on the cell door locking up our freedom. When my children are my age, they will not be free in any recognizably traditional American meaning of the word. I’d tell them to emigrate, but there’s nowhere left to go. I am left with nauseating near-conviction that I am a member of the last generation in the history of the world that is minimally truly free.
French Artist’s Calls For Peace End in Brutal Beating By Local Muslims
French street artist Combo was physically assaulted over his latest art work. Photo: Combo Culture Kidnapper/FacebookIt was very offensive and local Muslims demanded he take it down.
Four Muslims in Porte Dorée (the Golden door), a ghetto east of Paris, beat artist Combo after he refused to take down his Coexist street art. Combo suffered a dislocated shoulder, bruises and a black eye.
Guess he should have painted this version:
That would have worked so much better.
Edited to add: